|
|
Improving
Browning Invector Plus Shotgun Performance
I've
owned, appreciated, and professionally evaluated Browning shotguns for
quite some time. By now, that means countless A-5's, B-25s, B-2000's,
Double Autos, BPS's Citori's, B-80s, Golds, Silvers, and now a couple
Maxus models. Added to that, there has been a couple of A-Bolt slug guns,
and even a 500G or two thrown in the mix, along with the Browning Recoiless.
It is either countless because it is quite a pile of shotguns, or perhaps
because I just can't count very well.
Invector
Plus overbore style barrels have been with us for some twenty years by
now. My 425s had them, and even some of my more recently purchased A-5's
came with "Invector Plus" barrels and along with them, the Invector
Plus choke tubes. At the time of their introduction, they were heralded
as a significant improvement upon the shorter, stubbier "Winchoke"
barrels and tubes that preceded them. Perception beats reality on a regular
basis, but I hadn't focused on the Invector Plus choke array specifically
in any detail until recently. All of my personal guns tend to wear aftermarket
chokes; I've always been able to find what I'm looking for by patterning
different shells and switching to aftermarket chokes tubes one way or
another.
I
peppered the turkey target shown above with #5 shot at a laser verified
40 yards out of a vintage Browning Gold 12 gauge with a Trulock Precision
Hunter Extended choke tube. I'll happily admit that this is excessively
dense to be a good wingshooting pattern and that no standard factory OEM
type tube is remotely capable of such performance-- nor should it be expected.
However, I believe it is reasonable to expect factory tubes to approach
their own stated performance levels with extremely high quality ammunition.
When factory "Full" tubes can produce no better than Improved
Cylinder or Modified performance levels, even then with splotchy, uneven
patterns-- it is time to quickly move on.
For
a recent magazine assignment, I decided upon a simple question and an
equally simple test. In the "battle" between over-bored and
hard-chromed and Crio, what factory "full" choke could produce
more effective, higher percentage patterns with a quality (the B &
P MB Long Range) nickel-plated #5 shotshell? The answer, in this extremely
focused and limited test was that a Benelli SBE-II "full" choke
beat the pants off of a Maxus Invector Plus "full" choke. It
answered no questions on a full or complete basis, certainly not having
a sample size large enough to begin to form a conclusion, but it was interesting
nevertheless. Though the thrill of spewing pellets at paper and counting
the holes has long ago left me, I decided it was time for a closer, bit
more extensive look.
Two
Browning Golds, a Browning Cynergy, and two Browning Maxus shotguns all
went to the test field for two days, along with an ample supply of posterboard.
All of these guns, to Browning's credit, had been previously shown to
shoot to point of aim. To say that this is not always the case these days
is an understatement. The barrels were all measured with a "Precision
Skeets Gun Shop" bore gauge from Brownells, an indispensable tool
for this type of testing.
The
Browning barrels, called ".742 in." bore diameter were surprisingly
consistent, running about .741 in. as measured. The Browning Invector
Plus "Full" chokes ran about .707 inch exit diameter for an
actual constriction of .034 inch. Trulock Precision Hunter "Improved
Modified" extended tubes that were used in all 12 gauge shotguns
were .715 in. on the money for a constriction of .026 inch. All the shooting
was done off of bag and cradle at 44 yards.
The
results were overwhelmingly clear and pronounced. Despite having far less constriction to work with, the Trulock tubes placed 10% or more pellets
on the 18 x 22 in. posterboard at 44 yards. Perhaps more importantly,
the Trulock patterns universally more uniform distribution, and placed
an average of 30 percent (or more) pellets into the potential kill
zone of a pheasant, based on thirty-three square inches in this series
of tests. This is roughly the area of a six and one half inch circle,
but based on the situation the exposed area of a pheasant often varies.
Head down and wings pumping, the hot zone you experience may be dramatically
smaller.
This
is one of the reasons that the old pattern percentage in a 30 inch circle
at 40 yards can be both confusing and misleading. Cracking clays with
1 ounce of #9 shot around the skeet field hardly requires radical choking.
Shots are no longer than 22 yards or so, and that 1 oz. load gives you
around 579 pellets out of the muzzle. In fact, a friend of mine wasn't
breaking clays particularly well in a recent session; he asked me to give
his gun a try. I suggested he might have a little better luck if he screwed
a choke tube into his gun's completely empty threads. True story: stranger
things have happened. Pattern thinning due to range does not happen with
piles of tiny pellets in a skeet situation. But, our 1-1/4 oz. load of
nickel-plated #5 shot is a different animal, with 190 or so pellets to
work with, and the goal was a reasonable load for pheasants to 40 yards
and and a bit beyond, as a pheasant's altitude adds a little bit to the
purely horizontal range.
If
anyone believes at this stage of the game that the marking on a factory
choke tube actually means something, they couldn't be more wrong. All
the advice about "Oh, just use a modified, or just use a full
choke" is absurd. Even the advice about using a specific constriction
choke is of little help. The piles of posterboard here show that patterns
do not at all have to be "constriction-related." Again and again,
a 26 thousandths constriction Trulock Precision Hunter chokes out patterned
and out-performed 34 thousandths constriction factory chokes pattern after
pattern, gun after gun after gun, without a single exception.
After
all this shooting, I'm inclined to suggest that Invector Plus choke tubes
should be disposed of properly just as soon as possible if pattern quality
at any range is of any importance to you at all. Browning Invector Plus
"Full" chokes are simply not capable of true full choke performance
that I have been able to produce in this series of testing.
After
wading through all this, you might have the impression that this is some
sort of Browning bash article. I can assure you it is not. I've bagged
more birds with Browning shotguns than any other brand, though I've never
segmented bird count by brand. In fact, certain Browning models have proved
to be best of breed-- if you happen to read my review of the new Browning
Maxus, you can see how fabulously well it fared.
There
is a weak link in Browning shotguns, though, and it is with little question
the Invector Plus choke tubes. To be fair, Browning is no better or worse
than many other manufacturers in this regard. Firearm manufacturers long
ago realized that scant few wingshooters ever pattern their guns, and
fewer still would pay an extra $200 a gun for high quality choke tubes.
So, apparently Browning is forced to do what many other manufacturers
have done: job out their choke tube work, and to no great surprise the
lowest bidder gets the order. At the end of the business year, taking
forty bucks out of the cost of every shotgun can really add up, meaning
the difference between profit and loss or being competitive or not. All
businesses go through this cycle: whether it is lawnmower blades or bolts
and nuts in a home appliance, it is hard to put in additional cost and
quality that no one will pay you for. The firearms industry is hardly
immune from the pressure to get cost out of the box.
Nevertheless,
the interaction between wingshooter and game is the pattern you place.
Patterning your individual gun with the shells you intend to use at the
ranges you intend to shoot at is the best thing you can do to get more
birds in the bag, avoid lost game, use less shells, and to wring the best
performance out of your shotgun.
I
don't sell choke tubes, normally, and the Trulock tubes I choose are the
Trulocks tubes I use. In this case, though, I'll make an exception. Does
anybody want to buy some genuine factory Browning Invector Plus tubes?
I think I can help you out in that regard.
Copyright
2009 by Randy Wakeman. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|